Repository logo
 

Reconsidering the archaeological rarity of guinea pig bones in the Central Andes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorValdez, Lidio M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-28
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-28T00:37:59Z
dc.date.available2022-05-28T00:37:59Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.description.abstractIn his Peru Before the Incas, E. P. Lanning suggested that guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) might have been one of the most important food animals in the ancient central Andes (1967:18): "If we had any way of estimating the number of guinea pigs eaten in ancient times, we might find that they ranked with seafood as the most important sources of protein in the ancient diet, well ahead of the camelids and the Andean deer." Lanning was convinced that these small rodents, often kept in the kitchen and usually fed table scraps, were seriously underrepresented in the archaeological record and thus the quantity of their bones uncovered during excavation was not a true reflection of what might have been eaten in the past. Since Lanning's observation, excavations have been carried out at many central Andean archaeological sites, and they have yielded guinea pig bones only occasionally. Compared with the quantity of bones of the South American camelids, the quantity of guinea pig bones is insignificant.
dc.format.extent384.5 KB
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.citationValdez, Lidio M. and J. Ernesto Valdez. "Reconsidering the Archaeological Rarity of Guinea Pig Bones in the Central Andes," Current Anthropology 38, no. 5 (December 1997): 896-897. doi:10.1086/204679.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1086/204679
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14078/967
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.subjectarchaeological sites
dc.subjectexcavations
dc.subjectdiet
dc.titleReconsidering the archaeological rarity of guinea pig bones in the Central Andesen
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Reconsidering_the_archaeological_rarity_of-_1997_roam.pdf
Size:
384.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Department of Anthropology, Economics and Political Science