Browsing by Author "Chen, Kaiping"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How climate movement actors and news media frame climate change and strike: evidence from analyzing Twitter and news media discourse from 2018 to 2021
    (2022) Chen, Kaiping; Molder, Amanda L.; Duan, Zening; Boulianne, Shelley; Eckart, Christopher; Mallari, Prince; Yang, Diyi
    Twitter enables an online public sphere for social movement actors, news organizations, and others to frame climate change and the climate movement. In this paper, we analyze five million English tweets posted from 2018 to 2021 demonstrating how peaks in Twitter activity relate to key events and how the framing of the climate strike discourse has evolved over the past three years. We also collected over 30,000 news articles from major news sources in English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, United States, United Kingdom) to demonstrate how climate movement actors and media differ in their framing of this issue, attention to policy solutions, attribution of blame, and efforts to mobilize citizens to act on this issue. News outlets tend to report on global politicians’ (in)action toward climate policy, the consequences of climate change, and industry's response to the climate crisis. Differently, climate movement actors on Twitter advocate for political actions and policy changes as well as addressing the social justice issues surrounding climate change. We also revealed that conversations around the climate movement on Twitter are highly politicized, with a substantial number of tweets targeting politicians, partisans, and country actors. These findings contribute to our understanding of how people use social media to frame political issues and collective action, in comparison to the traditional mainstream news outlets.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Mobilizing mini-publics: the causal impact of deliberation on civic participation using panel data
    (2020) Boulianne, Shelley; Chen, Kaiping; Kahane, David
    Deliberative exercises may re-invigorate civic life by building citizens’ capacity to engage in other types of civic activities. This study examines members of a citizens’ panel (n=56) who participated in a six-day deliberative event on climate change and energy transition in Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) in 2012. We compared panelists’ civic engagement, political interest, and political knowledge with those of the general population using a concurrent random digit dialing survey conducted 2.5 years after the event (n=405). Panelists are more likely to talk about politics, and volunteer in the community compared to their counterparts in the larger population. Examining three points in time, we reveal a trajectory of increasing political knowledge and civic engagement. Finally, we examine the mechanisms that mobilize panelists into greater civic engagement. This study illustrates how deliberative events could strengthen engagement in civic and political life, depending on the degree to which deliberation was perceived to have occurred.