How do you solve a problem like scholarly peer review?

dc.contributor.author	Hall, Robyn
dc.date.accessioned	2017-03-29
dc.date.accessioned	2022-05-28T00:36:46Z
dc.date.available	2022-05-28T00:36:46Z
dc.date.issued	2017
dc.description	Presented on March 29, 2017 at the Centre for the Advancement of Faculty Excellence (CAFE) at MacEwan University in Edmonton, Alberta.
dc.description.abstract	Peer-review of research literature might be the best method we have for vetting academic work for quality and legitimacy prior to publication, but it is far from perfect. This session is for anyone planning to submit work to an academic journal, act as a peer-reviewer, or who gives students assignments that require them to only use peer- reviewed articles. It will provide an overview of the history of peer-review as we now know it, addressing its weaknesses and faults while also detailing strategies and initiatives currently underway to improve upon and strengthen current practices.
dc.format.extent	7 mb
dc.format.mimetype	PDF
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14078/769
dc.language	English
dc.language.iso	en
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject	peer review
dc.subject	academic journals
dc.subject	open peer review
dc.subject	copyright
dc.subject	information literacy
dc.subject	evaluating information
dc.title	How do you solve a problem like scholarly peer review?	en
dc.type	Presentation
dspace.entity.type

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1