Repository logo
 

Sidetracked by emotion: observers' ability to discriminate genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegations

dc.contributor.authorPeace, Kristine
dc.contributor.authorPorter, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorAlmon, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-28
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-28T00:36:45Z
dc.date.available2022-05-28T00:36:45Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractAssessing the credibility of reports of sexual victimization – often in the absence of corroboration – presents a significant challenge for legal decision makers. This study examined the accuracy of observers in discriminating genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegations. Further, we examined whether individual differences and cue utilization strategies influenced deception detection accuracy.
dc.description.urihttps://library.macewan.ca/cgi-bin/SFX/url.pl/926
dc.identifier.citationPeace, K. A., Porter, S., & Almon, D. (2012). Sidetracked by emotion: Observers’ ability to discriminate genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 322-335. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02013.x
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02013.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14078/762
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.subjectdeception
dc.subjectcredibility
dc.subjectobservation
dc.titleSidetracked by emotion: observers' ability to discriminate genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegationsen
dc.typeArticle

Files