Department of Organizational Behaviour, Human Resources Management and Management
Permanent link for this collection
Browse
Browsing Department of Organizational Behaviour, Human Resources Management and Management by Author "Cadigan, Francoise"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Conceptualizing and operationalizing 'inclusive' talent management: four different approaches(2023) Cadigan, Francoise; Dries, Nicky; Zelderen, Anand vanIn this chapter, we identify four different approaches to inclusive TM - a concept that is increasingly advocated for by both academics and practitioners but has so far lacked clarity and actionability. The four approaches are (1) focusing on potential and strengths rather than talent and gifts, (2) increasing the size of the talent pool, (3) defining a broader range of talent domains, and (4) topgrading the entire organization. We propose that exclusive and inclusive TM (co-)exist on a continuum rather than as dichotomies and develop a decision tree for organizations and researchers to determine which custom approach might best fit their talent philosophy.Item Preferences for performance versus potential in promotion recommendations(2019) Cadigan, Francoise; Kraichy, David; Uggerslev, Krista; Martin, Kasey; Fassina, NeilAs high‐performing employees with high potential (or superstars) are rare in the workplace, practitioners often face a performance–potential trade‐off when deciding who to promote. We use regulatory focus theory as a framework to examine whether Canadian managers (n = 58) and human resource (HR) professionals (n = 121) show a preference for performance or potential when making near‐term promotion recommendations. We show that respondents generally had a preference for performance versus potential when making their recommendations, and HR professionals versus managers accorded greater weight to potential. We discuss the implications of the relative emphasis on performance versus potential in promotion recommendations and when this may contribute to organizational inefficiencies.