US dominance of research on political communication: a meta-view
dc.contributor.author | Boulianne, Shelley | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-19 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-31T00:59:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-31T00:59:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description.abstract | The United States is the focal point of research on political communication. The dominance of the US scholarship is not an outcome of the efforts of a single peer reviewer, but rather an outcome of a larger system of knowledge production. Rojas and Valenzuela’s (2019) essay points out two issues related to cross-national research in political communication: how the US is treated as the “context-less” norm and how American scholarship shapes expectations for other areas of the world. Adding to this argument, I provide data about citation patterns in subfields within political communication as well as provide a summary of recent meta-analysis studies in political communication. These data affirm the US dominance in political communication scholarship. | |
dc.format.extent | 203.3KB | |
dc.format.mimetype | ||
dc.identifier.citation | Boulianne, Shelley. 2019. "US Dominance of Research on Political Communication: A Meta-View." Political Communication 36(4):660-665. doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1670899. | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670899 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14078/1412 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.rights | All Rights Reserved | |
dc.subject | political communication | |
dc.subject | United States | |
dc.subject | cross-national | |
dc.subject | meta-analysis | |
dc.subject | publication bias | |
dc.subject | citation patterns | |
dc.title | US dominance of research on political communication: a meta-view | |
dc.type | Article Post-Print |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- US_dominance_of_research_on_political-_2019_roam.pdf
- Size:
- 203.3 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: