US dominance of research on political communication: a meta-view

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBoulianne, Shelley
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-19
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-31T00:59:00Z
dc.date.available2022-05-31T00:59:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe United States is the focal point of research on political communication. The dominance of the US scholarship is not an outcome of the efforts of a single peer reviewer, but rather an outcome of a larger system of knowledge production. Rojas and Valenzuela’s (2019) essay points out two issues related to cross-national research in political communication: how the US is treated as the “context-less” norm and how American scholarship shapes expectations for other areas of the world. Adding to this argument, I provide data about citation patterns in subfields within political communication as well as provide a summary of recent meta-analysis studies in political communication. These data affirm the US dominance in political communication scholarship.
dc.format.extent203.3KB
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.citationBoulianne, Shelley. 2019. "US Dominance of Research on Political Communication: A Meta-View." Political Communication 36(4):660-665. doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1670899.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670899
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14078/1412
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.subjectpolitical communication
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectcross-national
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectpublication bias
dc.subjectcitation patterns
dc.titleUS dominance of research on political communication: a meta-view
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
US_dominance_of_research_on_political-_2019_roam.pdf
Size:
203.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Department of Sociology