Little Albert still missing
| dc.contributor.author | Powell, Russell A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-31T01:16:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-31T01:16:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Comments on the article by H. P. Beck, S. Levinson, & G. Irons. Beck, Levinson, and Irons presented a fascinating account of how they seemingly solved the mystery of whatever happened to Little Albert, the infant in whom Watson and Rayner (1920) claimed to have conditioned a rat phobia. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://library.macewan.ca/cgi-bin/SFX/url.pl/DY1 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Powell, R. A. (2010). Little Albert still missing [Comment]. American Psychologist, 65, 299-300. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019288 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14078/2061 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.rights | All Rights Reserved | |
| dc.subject | John Broadus Watson | |
| dc.subject | Little Albert | |
| dc.subject | child psychology | |
| dc.subject | conditioned emotional response | |
| dc.subject | history of psychology | |
| dc.title | Little Albert still missing | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type |