How do you solve a problem like scholarly peer review?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHall, Robyn
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-28T00:36:46Z
dc.date.available2022-05-28T00:36:46Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionPresented on March 29, 2017 at the Centre for the Advancement of Faculty Excellence (CAFE) at MacEwan University in Edmonton, Alberta.
dc.description.abstractPeer-review of research literature might be the best method we have for vetting academic work for quality and legitimacy prior to publication, but it is far from perfect. This session is for anyone planning to submit work to an academic journal, act as a peer-reviewer, or who gives students assignments that require them to only use peer- reviewed articles. It will provide an overview of the history of peer-review as we now know it, addressing its weaknesses and faults while also detailing strategies and initiatives currently underway to improve upon and strengthen current practices.
dc.format.extent7 mb
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14078/769
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectpeer review
dc.subjectacademic journals
dc.subjectopen peer review
dc.subjectcopyright
dc.subjectinformation literacy
dc.subjectevaluating information
dc.titleHow do you solve a problem like scholarly peer review?
dc.typePresentation
dspace.entity.type
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
How_do_you_solve_a_problem_like_scholarly_peer-_2017_roam.pdf
Size:
6.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Library Faculty Works